ericam

My feedback

  1. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  WCF (Web Services)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ericam commented  · 

    There is a blog posting describing how to remove obsolete contracts from the WSDL:
    https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/carlosfigueira/2011/10/05/wcf-extensibility-wsdl-export-extension/

    Does this meet your requirements?

  2. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  WCF (Web Services)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ericam commented  · 

    At this point of time we support exception marshaling through fault contracts.

    Can you please clarify and provide an example/sample of what additional scenarios are needed for WCF VNext?

  3. 38 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  WCF (Web Services)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. 53 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  WCF (Web Services)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ericam commented  · 

    Unfortunately, implementing this suggestion would result in a breaking change. At this point of time, WCF does not plan to investigate this ask. Please let us know if there are further concerns.

  5. 133 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  WCF (Web Services)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ericam commented  · 

    At this point of time, using NET.Pipe is the recommended approach for WCF in-process communications. We do not plan to support local binding for the future.

  6. 119 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  WCF (Web Services)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ericam commented  · 

    At this point of time there are several 3rd party Nuget packages released that accomplish WCF dependency injection where no default constructors are required (such as Ninject.Extensions.Wcf, Unity.WCF, Autofac.WCF, Castle.WcfIntegrationFacility, etc). There are no plans for WCF to incorporate this functionality directly in the .NET Framework.

  7. 73 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  WCF (Web Services)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ericam commented  · 

    What are the specific setting and/or scenarios that need better documentation?

  8. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: facebook google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  WCF (Web Services)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    ericam commented  · 

    Here is a great example of how to create a custom WCF transport channel. Please let us know what further difficulties you have on extending the transport channel.

    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dmetzgar/archive/2012/10/16/an-updated-custom-wcf-transport-channel-example.aspx

Feedback and Knowledge Base