9 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• Jonas Gauffin commented  ·  January 4, 2013 1:15 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I've described how you can achieve that here: http://blog.gauffin.org/2012/05/griffin-mvccontrib-the-plugin-system/

  But it would be better if the support was built in, since Razor gives a lot of warnings for some class libraries (it seems like it tries to compile the views as .NET 2)

• Felickz commented  ·  June 26, 2012 6:39 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This pattern is a keystone for multi-tenant applications. It would be helpful to have some official code or P&P guidance on this!

• Graeme Miller commented  ·  June 25, 2012 1:25 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This the top feature that I would want in MVC. Managing large scale projects made up of re-usable modules requires this feature.

• Alexey Tarasov commented  ·  May 3, 2012 12:36 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  IMPORTANT
  Areas should also be able to register all their types in a Dependency Injection Container Builder by themselves.

  It would be very nice to be able to specify area's url prefix in the application start for each area.

• Emmanuel Morales commented  ·  September 12, 2011 3:08 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This feature should facilitate the sharing of application components/widgets.

• bchoi commented  ·  August 16, 2011 9:43 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This is a crucial feature for large scale web application.

• c# commented  ·  August 6, 2011 10:03 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  We are currently shipping multiple products each has its own web based configuration pages and they also access a shared web based-portal for authentication + aggregated xml sitemap. We have been thinking to switch to mvc but lack of portable areas feature stopped us :( please have this feature in 4.0

• Thomas Bratt commented  ·  July 26, 2011 11:57 a.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Would be great to avoid having scripts, etc as embedded resources so that we don't have to recompile everytime.

  Areas that could be reused across projects would be great, without incurring the overhead of rebuilding a component every time a small change is required.

• terrance smith commented  ·  July 18, 2011 7:04 p.m.  ·  Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Portable Areas can be added via MVC Contrib so that but adding a module easily from a CMS or a blog. Why isn't this higher? lol