The injection of controllers work with MEF

Take a look Cucumber (cukes.info) for Ruby on Rails. The tool is fun to use and helps me think in terms of the behavior of the application that I'm trying to build.

The homepage of asp.net is very nice and easy to look at, but whenever you hover on the circle buttons on the top and that transparency shows up I get very annoyed. I believe the transparency should be decreased by 23.5%, the transparency really overwhelms the page and it's difficult to focus on other objects while it's hilighted.

I would really like to have real time update on UI and javascript etc etc like this guy is doing in the presentation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUv66718DII

That would be awesome. Page Inspector is a cool idea but still it is a fancy way of browsing. Still need to press ctrl + shift + Enter (same behavior for browsers).

I've been experimenting with the use of Razor/C# code in CSS files. Like other precompiling CSS solutions, it compiles the CSS source file to get a clean CSS output.

Two major advantages over other solutions:

– There are few limitations. Anything I can accomplish in Razor/C# I can also do in my CSS file (variables, loops, dynamic data, helpers... you name it!).

– I can use a programming language that I, and others (!), are already familiar with. My team don't have to learn any new syntax, and when a new team member is assigned he understands the code instantly.

When someone creates a new project, there should be an option to create a startup project or template that resembles a common UI and controls with demo data in place and event hooked up to the UI. A dev can then take that template, hook to the app data and get a page / project setup fairly quickly

Sometimes you want to search the code, not the documentation

As open source programming grows up , every IDE is know trying to integrate various server side technologies , so VS must incorporate php integration and its project type in its IDE along with server integration and intellisence .

It would be nice to enable generic declaration in the markup of an asp.net page and adapt framework to have generic controls. For example: <asp:ListView`1[SomeClass] runat="server" ... like it is done in settings file for .net application

I know it is possible using IronRuby, but I would like to see it as an officially supported option

Allow Web.Config transforms to be applied to a deployment package without a rebuild under a different configuration.
QA packages can then be converted to production release packages without fear of introducing any subsequent changes.
Add ins exist but would prefer to have built in support

As you say in the roadmap "Cloud ready:"... "the task of deploying and hosting". Would be amazing if this was something pushed for by the MVC team. Obviously involves other MS teams, but I think its great you guys see this huge hole (mainly with SQL Azure) in the whole MS cloud offering. Complex deploys to Azure are a PAIN, and I see very little about future plans to properly sort this out.

Please provide the intellisense support for object-oriented and "mixin" patterns of Mootools. Also intellisense should work when chaining the methods in jQuery, Mootools and Prototype. This article would give you some insight on different OOP patterns on JS -> http://jqueryvsmootools.com/index.html.

Sometimes I have the need to change the project type. Instead of opening up another project file and copy the project type guids, it would be extremely helpful to be able to change the type of a project through a dialog

HttpContext.AcceptWebSocketRequest() internally uses IIS7WorkerRequest, which makes high-level WebSockets support in ASP.NET depend on IIS. But IIS is not the only http.sys-based web server for ASP.NET! (http://ultidev.com/products/UWS/) To enable other ASP.NET web server vendors support for WebSockets, *HttpWorkerRequest should be modified to include WebSockets access virtual methods*, and HttpContext.AcceptWebSocketRequest() should call standard HttpWorkerRequest interface instead of proprietary IIS7WorkerRequest.

HttpWorkerRequest must have WebSockets interface used by

Simple membership isn't as simple as original membership, would rather depend on it

The entire VS2010 web project experience is based on a single project in a single solution. A larger application is split in separate modules and each module would be a sub web project. It would be convenient if we could partition our web development into framework development (infrastructure projects) and functional development (application projects). Together they are the target website. In our organization the infrastructure team uses one solution and the functional teams use another solution. The development experience for regular .NET projects, like library projects, Control projects, EXE projects is needed for websites as well.